Promise Tracker
0 delivered, 0 close, 1 missed.
View Promises →Kotak Mahindra Bank's Q1 FY25 consolidated PAT (ex-KGI transaction) grew 7% YoY to INR 4,435 crore, but bank-level PAT was flat at INR 3,520 crore.
✓ Verified against BSE filing
Kotak Mahindra Bank's Q1 FY25 consolidated PAT (ex-KGI transaction) grew 7% YoY to INR 4,435 crore, but bank-level PAT was flat at INR 3,520 crore. NIM compressed 20bps QoQ to 5.02% due to rising deposit costs and a shift away from high-yield unsecured lending amid the RBI embargo on credit cards and digital onboarding. Customer assets grew 20% YoY, driven by corporate and secured retail, while unsecured retail was flat. Credit costs rose to 55bps annualized, reflecting stress in lower-ticket unsecured and microfinance portfolios. Management highlighted progress on RBI-mandated tech upgrades and reiterated a focus on deposit franchise and cost control. The KGI insurance stake sale generated INR 3,013 crore exceptional gain. Risks include sustained margin pressure and asset quality deterioration in unsecured and microfinance segments.
कोटक महिंद्रा बैंक की पहली तिमाही (Q1 FY25) में कुल मुनाफा (PAT) 7% बढ़कर ₹4,435 करोड़ हो गया, लेकिन बैंक का अपना मुनाफा ₹3,520 करोड़ पर स्थिर रहा। ब्याज दरों में कमी (NIM) 5.02% पर आ गई, क्योंकि जमा पर ब्याज बढ़ा और RBI के प्रतिबंध के कारण क्रेडिट कार्ड व डिजिटल बैंकिंग पर असर पड़ा। ग्राहकों की संपत्ति 20% बढ़ी, मुख्यतः कॉरपोरेट और सुरक्षित कर्ज से, जबकि असुरक्षित कर्ज स्थिर रहा। कर्ज देने में जोखिम (Credit Cost) बढ़कर 55bps हो गया, जो छोटे कर्ज और माइक्रोफाइनेंस में तनाव दिखाता है। KGI बीमा बेचने से ₹3,013 करोड़ का एकमुश्त लाभ हुआ। आगे मुनाफे पर दबाव और कर्ज की गुणवत्ता बिगड़ने का खतरा है।
0 delivered, 0 close, 1 missed.
View Promises →Sustained NIM compression
View Risks →Full transcript text is available on this route.
Read Transcript →CASA ratio declined to 43.4% from 45.3% a year ago, reflecting industry-wide shift of savers to capital markets.
Group assets under management crossed INR 6.36 lakh crore, driven by strong equity AUM growth at Kotak AMC.
Despite the embargo on new card issuance, Kotak gained market share in credit card spends during the quarter.
Management plans to increase branch network from ~1,900 to 3,000-3,500 over 4-5 years, adding 150-250 annually.
Plans to add 150-250 branches per year, focusing on top 68-75 cities, to reach 3,000-3,500 branches over 4-5 years.
CFO confirmed that incremental costs related to the RBI embargo are within the guidance provided last quarter.
Management reiterated goal to reach mid-teens as a percentage of total advances once the RBI embargo is lifted.
The bank plans to continue adding around 150 branches annually, focusing on under-penetrated areas.
Technology expenditure will remain around 10% of total operating expenses, with a shift toward risk resilience and capacity.
The bank aims to grow customer assets at 1.5-2 times nominal GDP growth, implying continued above-system growth.
NIM fell 20bps QoQ to 5.02% due to rising deposit costs and lower unsecured lending; further pressure could persist if CASA does not recover.
Management declined to provide a specific timeline for lifting the embargo, citing dependence on RBI's comfort with progress and sustainability.
Delinquencies in microfinance rose in states like Tamil Nadu, MP, and UP due to heat waves and elections; recovery expected in H2 but uncertain.
The RBI order stopping digital customer acquisition and credit card issuance could last longer than expected, impacting growth and market share.
CASA ratio declined to 45.5% and deposit costs are rising; continued pressure could compress NIMs.
Recent senior-level departures, including the group president, raise questions about bench strength and execution continuity.
Mentioned in Q1 FY24, Q3 FY24, Q4 FY24
The bank aims to grow customer assets at 1.5-2 times nominal GDP growth, implying continued above-system growth.
Management reiterated goal to reach mid-teens as a percentage of total advances once the RBI embargo is lifted.
NIM fell 20bps QoQ to 5.02% due to rising deposit costs and lower unsecured lending; further pressure could persist if CASA does not recover.
View Risks →