Bajaj Electricals Limited — Q3 FY26
Bajaj Electricals reported a mixed Q3 FY26 with lighting solutions growing 9% YoY, but consumer products revenue declined 25% due to deliberate channel inventory normalization.
✓ Verified against BSE filing
Did management answer the analysts?
Every material analyst question, graded on whether management actually answered it — with the verbatim exchange and quantitative claims checked against filed numbers.
Why sharp margin decline in consumer products despite peers improving?
Asked by Natasha Jen, Philip Capital
Management explained the cause but did not quantify the margin impact or give a specific timeline for recovery.
Read the exchange
The topline growth as well as margin the decline has been very severe. Now now that all your peers said numbers are out everybody has uh even if top line has been modest, margin improvement has come through because of winter products and they are high margin and Bajage is any which way uh one of the better players when it comes to say gizers or room heaters etc. So wanted to know why such a sharp decline.
One of the things when we are flushing out stocks so while uh we are not selling to our distributors but we are running promotions on that that stock to move to trade. So part of that will get reflected in the margin drop. ... this is temporary so underlined margin will be healthier than what you're seeing and you will see that improving as you move forward.
When will inventory normalization benefit accrue in numbers?
Asked by Natasha Jen, Philip Capital
Management gave a timeline of 'a quarter or so' but did not quantify the expected benefit.
Read the exchange
Can you just deep dive a little bit as to what are these steps that you've taken in terms of inventory normalization and how can what kind of benefit or rather when will this benefit acrew in the numbers?
The inventory normalization has uh taken across uh our trade channel uh and also uh in our aggregators uh which service the e-commerce channel ... we expect the normalization process to continue in a quarter or so we should be in a healthy place.
Strategy for wires business: outsourcing, revenue, margin estimates?
Asked by Natasha Jen, Philip Capital
Management refused to provide any revenue or margin estimates for the new wires business.
Read the exchange
So my second question is on the buyers division. So uh broadly can you tell us the strategy here as to uh will it be completely outsourced and what are the estimates that we can build in for Baj say in the medium term both in terms of topline contribution from this as well as margins and uh will you be uh selling this from your existing FMEG channel itself?
Strategy as of now is that we introduce considering the strength of our distribution ... we are exploring that what is the most beneficial way and we are just enter into that and looking at the current traction we feel the outlook will be As of now we don't want to project in terms of numbers or revenues which are coming out of that looking at the forward numbers.
What will make dealers switch from Polycab or Havells to Bajaj?
Asked by Natasha Jen, Philip Capital
Management cited brand strength but did not provide concrete reasons for dealer switching.
Read the exchange
What would lead a dealer to switch from say a polycab or a hls to a baj.
Again brand strength which is there and the as you are aware that and the quality of what we are going to offer which comes along with the brand the trust which is created on that basis we are in this particular business and which is the legacy of brand miss and when you say quality so you you are outsourcing it completely right
Why was channel correction needed and why now?
Asked by Manoj, Equest Capital
Management clearly explained the rationale: poor summer season led to high channel inventory, prompting correction.
Read the exchange
I just want to understand the thought process behind this channel correction. What made us took this decision? Why we took this decision?
If you look back at the year so far we have seen that the summer season did not pan out as per the expectations and owing to that the channel was carrying a significant amount of inventory. ... we thought it is prudent and judicious to take this correction rather than loading the inventory into the channel more and more.
If market share gained, why was channel inventory higher than peers?
Asked by Manoj, Equest Capital
Management explained timing but did not reconcile market share gains with higher inventory relative to peers.
Read the exchange
On one side we are talking about market share gains but on the other side we are saying like our channel inventory was higher as compared to peer that is that the right interpretation and then if it that's the case then probably our Q1 Q2 numbers probably the correction that we took in Q3 that should actually should have been more visible in Q1 and Q2 if we would have maintained that normalized levels of inventory.
The levels of inventory remained elevated and the assumption was it would go down first in due to the summers did not pan out and then after that which was quarter 3 which was about the festive period we thought it's the right time to normalize this as we move into the next financial year. ... coolers are down by almost 38 to 40% versus our sales last year.
Will normalized performance be visible from Q4 or FY27?
Asked by Manoj, Equest Capital
Management clearly stated that normalized performance will be more visible in FY27, not Q4.
Read the exchange
So somewhere should we expect a normalized performance from fourth quarter onwards or it will take some time still
It would visible be more visible during FY27. As we said earlier, we are in the path of normalization. In pockets, there are still some additional corrections which we need to take. And therefore by FY27 should start seeing positive results.
Is summer product inventory still high? Clarification.
Asked by Pravin Sahai, Prabhuas Dilatar Capital
Management clarified that summer product inventory is lower than start of quarter and will normalize in one more quarter.
Read the exchange
My first question is or a clarification is related to the as you had mentioned in the opening remark that the summer products still have higher inventory. Is it what we have said?
It is lower than what it was in the beginning of the quarter and we said that it's in the process of normalization and it would take probably one more quarter for it to completely normalize.
Any price hike expected to mitigate commodity inflation?
Asked by Pravin Sahai, Prabhuas Dilatar Capital
Management provided specific price hike range and stated it covers bulk of commodity inflation.
Read the exchange
Is there any price hike expected from you know the paj or you had taken to mitigate the commodity inflation so far?
Yes, we took we have already announced a price increase ranging from 2 to 5% from with effect from 1st of February and we expect to cover bulk of the commodity inflation with this price three plus.
What is the traction so far for switchgear segment?
Asked by Pravin Sahai, Prabhuas Dilatar Capital
Management gave qualitative feedback but no numbers on sales or market share.
Read the exchange
Some time back you had announced for the switch gear so how is the traction from that segment.
When we launched we had a good response from the trade current partners as well and that time we were working on creating a stock and the stock took little more time. So secondary has started since last month and the feedback from the market in terms of quality and other parameters is much encouraging.
Is inventory cleanup a one-off event or ongoing process?
Asked by Alok S, 361 Asset Management
Management clarified it's not a board-approved process but a channel hygiene initiative, not a one-off write-off.
Read the exchange
Is there now should we think like a board approved process where inventory in the trade beyond a particular duration would be considered to be like you know kind of flushed out this way or this would be a one-off event.
There is no board approval or inventory flush out. ... It is not our inventory which is an issue. It is the inventory with the channel partners and the channel hygiene which we were more focused on.
Quantification of inventory days reduction and target levels?
Asked by Alok S, 361 Asset Management
Management gave a 30% reduction but no absolute days or target level, calling it dynamic.
Read the exchange
What were the outstanding or in elevated levels in terms of days or categories which are kind of bulked up in the trade. What has it come down now to and what is like a normal hygiene level as a process going ahead you would want to maintain any such maybe quantification would be helpful.
In consumer products it is down by 30% in terms of number of days. ... How much inventory we want to carry in the channel at the same time what's the healthy is the dynamic number that keeps on changing.