Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited — Q2 FY26
ABFRL reported Q2 FY26 revenue of ₹1,908 crore, up 13% YoY, driven by strong like-to-like growth across segments.
✓ Verified against BSE filing
Did management answer the analysts?
Every material analyst question, graded on whether management actually answered it — with the verbatim exchange and quantitative claims checked against filed numbers.
Cash consumption in H1 and need for additional capital
Asked by Devanshu Bansal, Emkay Global
Management gave specific cash figures and corrected the analyst's estimate.
Read the exchange
Have we consumed about INR 900 crore of cash in first half from the balance sheet and this ballpark correct?
No Devanshu, we started my March cash was roughly INR 2,072 crore in ABFRL standalone which is today INR 1,600 crore. So roughly INR 500 odd crore.
Need for additional capital in ABFRL
Asked by Devanshu Bansal, Emkay Global
Management explained seasonality and stated no concern, though no explicit yes/no on capital raise.
Read the exchange
At this run rate, do you think that we would need to raise additional capital going ahead in ABFRL?
First half is when most of the inventory buildup happens. Second half cash collection is dramatically higher. At this point of time there's no cause of concern on that account.
Like-to-like growth for Pantaloons adjusting for festival preponement
Asked by Devanshu Bansal, Emkay Global
Management acknowledged the benefit but did not quantify the L2L growth, citing external disruptions.
Read the exchange
I was checking if you could help me understand the underlying like-to-like L2L for Pantaloons because there must be some benefit of festive preponement to this quarter.
Yes, there was a benefit with this being advanced. Unfortunately, the last seven or eight days that we saw a terrific amount of rain there and the disruption in Assam, a lot of that growth got wiped out.
Pantaloons margin drop despite good L2L and store closures
Asked by Devanshu Bansal, Emkay Global
Management explained the reason but did not provide the requested like-for-like margin comparison.
Read the exchange
There is still a margin drop in Pantaloons. On a like-for-like for Pantaloons, can you help us understand what has been the margin performance this quarter versus last quarter?
The margin impact has also been because of the significantly higher marketing investments versus last year. In terms of percentage, we have doubled our marketing investments.
TCNS overall growth and outlook
Asked by Devanshu Bansal, Emkay Global
Management explained the accounting change and provided comparable revenue figures, addressing the discrepancy.
Read the exchange
While the L2L you reported very encouraging 19% but basic calculation shows a 15% decline in H1. Can you help us better understand if the calculation is right and what is the outlook ahead?
We reported revenue last year was INR 254 crore approximately. The comparable of that would have been lower by INR 40 crore. Against that, there is a double-digit growth in TCNS, around INR 240 crore this quarter.
CapEx for H2 and store expansion plans
Asked by Gaurav Jogani, JM Financial
Management gave a specific CapEx range for H2.
Read the exchange
What should be the CapEx for the H2 part of the business?
CapEx primarily will be in on around 30 stores and that's why around 30 stores. I don't think more than INR 100-220-25 crore will be spent on capex in these two businesses.
Profitability split of Ethnic business excluding TCNS losses
Asked by Gaurav Jogani, JM Financial
Management described the loss-making entities but did not quantify the profitability of the rest.
Read the exchange
What kind of profitability are we making in the other parts of the Ethnic piece of business?
We have very marginal losses in TCNS now. Most of the losses are TASVA and some of the other smaller designer businesses. On an annual level, TCNS losses are significantly coming down. TASVA still has losses and rest of the business is profitable.
Sustainability of Pantaloons L2L growth and store performance divergence
Asked by Archana Menon, Morgan Stanley
Management expressed confidence but did not provide quantitative evidence or divergence data.
Read the exchange
How do you think of this in terms of how it can sustain? Do you see a performance divergence between stores which have been renovated or the new stores versus the earlier ones?
We feel pretty confident given the performance of the second half that we will continue to sustain our growth. On the stores, it's still early days, just been two, three months. We'd wait for another six odd months to kind of come to a conclusion.
Pantaloons full-year margin outlook with marketing spend
Asked by Archana Menon, Morgan Stanley
Management reiterated the previously guided margin range.
Read the exchange
How should we be thinking of that for the full year versus last year when we also factored in the marketing as well as some losses from home?
We indicated when we met investors in the month of April that this segment margin should be in a range of around 15-17%. We will aspire to go to, you know, we like to maintain that.
Brand perception gap leading to Pantaloons revamp
Asked by Tejash Shah, Avendus Spark Institutional Equities
Management avoided stating any gap or negative feedback, instead framing it as a strategic evolution.
Read the exchange
What was the gap or feedback that we found in the study that led us to do this massive revamp?
It was not a question of lacking. It was a question of where we have been on the journey with Pantaloons. The insights that we got with the sharp definition of the consumer segment allowed us to identify white spaces in terms of positioning.
Store economics with new Pantaloons identity
Asked by Tejash Shah, Avendus Spark Institutional Equities
Management provided margin targets but did not address revenue per sq ft or inventory turns as asked.
Read the exchange
How should I think about store economics with this new identity? Revenue per sq ft, inventory turns, gross margin.
Pantaloons margins are closer to 50%, not 25%. We would like it to be north of 50% gross margin. The business is operating in negative working capital. Store profitability needs to be closer to 25%.
TMRW losses increase and use of raised capital
Asked by Kunal Shah, Jefferies
Management acknowledged the higher losses and explained the cause.
Read the exchange
The losses in that business have gone up in the last two quarters. Anything to read or there's some bit of seasonality here as well?
The losses are a little higher than what we would have liked. We have been trying to push higher growth rate. The revenue to advertising spend has been slightly adverse. That is a journey that we'll go through.
| Claim | Management said | Filing | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| TCNS revenue last year INR 254 crore, comparable lower by INR 40 crore | ₹254 cr | ₹1,982 cr | Understated vs filing |
| TCNS revenue this quarter around INR 240 crore | ₹240 cr | ₹1,982 cr | Understated vs filing |
| TCNS like-to-like growth 13% for similar accounting | 13% | 13% | Matches filing |
| Pantaloons segment margin guided 15-17% | 15% | 3% | Overstated vs filing |
| Pantaloons gross margin aspiration north of 50%, currently just short | 50% | 3% | Overstated vs filing |
| Luxury retail segment grew 13% this quarter | 13% | 13% | Matches filing |
Filed figures sourced from Screener.in. Claims within a small tolerance of the filing are marked “matches filing”.