Sobha / Q3-FY25

SOBHA Q3 FY25 earnings call.

A source-linked concall view: reported numbers, management language, guidance, commitments and risks that should carry forward.

Research layer active

ConCallIQ research layer

Signal, with the source still visible.

Use the controls below to narrow the view, then follow the evidence into the next layer of context.

Watch2025-01-29Back to SOBHA

Revenue

₹1,224 Cr

verified against source

Revenue YoY

76%

reported change

EBITDA

Pending

latest reported figure

Source

screener in

record provenance

Actual signal trajectory

Where this quarter sits.

source records only
EBITDA (₹ Cr)PositiveWatchNegative
6 actual records
Actual quarterly EBITDA (₹ Cr) trajectoryReported values plotted by quarter. Hover or focus a point for its quarter, value, and source sentiment.Q1 FY25: 85.4 · Positive source sentiment · 2024-07-15Q1 FY25Q4 FY25: 418 · Positive source sentimentQ4 FY25Q1 FY26: 73 · Watch source sentimentQ1 FY26Q2 FY26: 157 · Watch source sentimentQ2 FY26Q3 FY26: 78 · Watch source sentiment · 2026-01-29Q3 FY26Q4 FY26: 194 · Positive source sentiment · 2026-05-15Q4 FY2641873
Values are taken from the available verified source records; sentiment color is a separate source-read indicator.

Quarter read

What the record says.

Sobha reported Q3 FY25 real estate sales value of INR 1,388 crores with 9M FY25 sales at INR 4,440 crores, falling significantly short of the INR 8,500 crore full-year guidance. The company attributes this to slower sales velocity in higher-ticket projects and delayed launches, particularly Town Park (RERA received post-quarter). Q3 total revenue surged 76% YoY to INR 1,256 crores. 28% project-level PBT margin on INR 15,000 crore unrecognized revenue provides long-term visibility. Margin pressure this quarter stemmed from one-time losses in de-scoped civil and glazing contracts, which management expects to resolve by Q4. Sobha's share of sales reached 90% (highest ever), driven by Bangalore projects. New launches of 4.66M sq ft across 4 cities have been executed with 9M sq ft annual target maintained. Expansion to 15 cities planned for FY26 including Greater Noida, Hosur, and Mumbai. Risks include sales velocity challenges in premium projects and execution risk on new market entries.

Colored figures show movement against the previous available record.

Guidance to track

  • Management acknowledged inability to achieve INR 8,500 crore guidance; now targets reaching last year's sales value with potential upside from new Bangalore launches.
  • One-time contractual losses from de-scoped projects are largely complete. Margins expected to improve from Q4 FY25 with full shift to higher-margin real estate recognition.
  • Company maintains full-year launch target of 9M sq ft across 6 projects in 4 cities. Town Park (3.67M sq ft) received RERA post quarter-end.
  • On INR 15,000 crore unrecognized revenue, CFO stated consolidated PBT (after corporate overhead and interest) will be in 15-18% range by FY30.

Risks flagged

  • Analyst Himanshu Upadhyay questioned whether higher ticket sizes (INR 14,000/sq ft realization) and slower sales pace in large-ticket projects could impact project-level IRRs. Management acknowledged the issue but expects new launches to address this.
  • Despite INR 8,500 crore guidance, 9M sales target appears unachievable. Parikshit Kandpal from HDFC Securities challenged management on whether launch assumptions were realistic, noting that actual opened-for-sale area is much lower than announced project sizes.
  • Management disclosed Mumbai project is 'very early stages of approval process' with visibility expected in 3-4 months. Location details withheld from investors. Geographic expansion execution remains uncertain.
  • MD explicitly stated that lower-margin projects recognized in joint development agreements combined with cost increases in real estate projects led to margin compression, not just contractual business losses.

Key quotes

  • We are currently aiming at reaching at least what we have done last financial year in terms of pre-sales, and if we can do that, that would be a good outcome for us.
  • It's a combination of both the real estate cost increases and lower margin projects that we have recognized in the joint development projects, and combined with even the contractual losses, all of them put together has led to this.
  • In this, Kunal, if we add corporate overhead plus interest plus depreciation, it will be removed. So will the PBT level be between the range of 15% to 18% in FY 2030 going forward?

Research modules

Go one layer deeper.