Propane competition intensifying
Industrial consumers are switching to cheaper propane/LPG, pressuring PNG volumes. Management responded by offering competitive pricing.
Powergrid · risk themes across the available quarters.
Bear-case history
Industrial consumers are switching to cheaper propane/LPG, pressuring PNG volumes. Management responded by offering competitive pricing.
APM allocation deficit was 14% in Q1, trending down but could remain a margin headwind if domestic gas supply doesn't keep pace with demand.
Analyst raised concern about potential price regulation; management dismissed it, citing natural competition, but risk remains if government intervenes.
Management acknowledged that transformers, reactors, and GIS are in tight supply, with costs rising 70-80% since 2017-18, potentially delaying projects.
The offshore wind evacuation projects (INR 13,100 crore total) are India's first, and management noted costs may be higher than routine projects, posing execution risk.
Analyst noted flattish standalone PAT due to lower dividends from SPVs; management confirmed this but said consolidated view is more relevant going forward.
Management could not confirm if the 125 GW RE requirement for green hydrogen is included in the National Electricity Plan, indicating potential policy uncertainty.
ROW issues remain a significant bottleneck for transmission line commissioning, especially in Delhi and Haryana, despite new compensation guidelines.
Transformer costs have doubled in seven years, and GIS bay costs have risen from INR 6 crore to INR 14-15 crore, impacting project costs.
The Leh HVDC project faces delays due to technology challenges at high altitude; an alternative AC solution may be costlier and unproven in India.
Consolidated PAT fell ~2% YoY partly due to INR 70 crore loss from joint venture ESL, which management did not elaborate on further.
Management acknowledged challenges in transformer and HVDC equipment availability due to global demand, though insulated by firm-price contracts.
CERC draft regulations expected by Nov-Dec 2023; any adverse changes could impact regulated equity returns.
High-altitude terrain and extreme weather limit working months to 5-6 per year, posing timeline risks.
H1 FY24 saw fewer bids; management expects pick-up in H2, but any delay could impact order book.
EESL contributed a loss of INR 100 crore in H1 FY25 due to mounting receivables and interest costs, with no clear timeline for reversal.
New CERC tariff regulation (2024-29) reduced O&M charges by INR 600 crore annually, impacting profitability by ~INR 300 crore in H1.
Revenue from legacy RTM projects is declining due to lower depreciation and interest, partially offsetting growth from new TBCB projects.
Analyst raised concern about potential ROE compression in TBCB projects due to competitive bidding, though management downplayed the risk.
ROW challenges from landowners have delayed project execution, though new government guidelines are expected to ease the process.
TBCB tendering has slowed down due to approval processes, which could impact future order inflows.
Shortage of transformers, GIS, and HVDC equipment with long lead times could affect project timelines.
As assets complete 12 years, depreciation and interest costs decline, reducing revenue by ~9% of project cost, which may pressure reported growth.
Draft regulations propose changes to O&M norms and reduce ROE to 15% for new assets. Management expects minimal impact but discussions ongoing.
Management acknowledged potential challenges in transformer and GIS supply, but noted government actions to develop more vendors.
Analyst flagged that the INR 310,000 crore ISTS target over FY22-27 appears aggressive given the need for rapid awarding and execution.
The project has a long gestation of ~5 years from order placement, with commissioning expected only by FY2030, posing execution risk.
Management acknowledged challenges in land acquisition (ROW issues) and supply of high-voltage transformers and GIS equipment, which could delay project commissioning beyond the typical two-year timeline.
The CERC tariff true-up impacted Q3 PAT by INR 140 crore, and the nine-month impact is ~INR 440 crore. This regulatory adjustment could continue to weigh on earnings.
PowerGrid's 39% stake in EESL resulted in a loss of INR 140 crore in 9M FY25, contributing to the decline in consolidated PAT. Management has stopped further equity infusion.
Management reduced the interim dividend per share (from INR 4.5 to INR 3.25) to conserve equity for the growing CapEx pipeline. Further reductions are possible if CapEx continues to rise.
Domestic transformer capacity (228,000 MVA) is insufficient vs demand (421,000 MVA in FY27), potentially delaying projects unless Chinese component imports are allowed.
While new guidelines have helped, ROW remains a challenge in some states; execution depends on timely adoption by local authorities.
Two major HVDC projects (Barmer II-Srikakulam, Bikaner V-Begunia) may slip beyond FY27, impacting CapEx phasing.
Intrastate projects (e.g., Maharashtra, Karnataka) involve higher execution risks; management will bid selectively based on risk assessment.
Analyst noted a deteriorating trend in CapEx-to-annuity ratios for TBCB projects, which could pressure IRRs. Management acknowledged but maintained 10-12% IRR target.
Management admitted smart metering progress is slow due to teething problems in software, with only 30,000 of 69,000 meters installed.
Consolidated subsidiary profits fell YoY partly due to a one-time INR 200 crore tariff order in Q4 FY23, which may not recur.
ROW compensation policy changes and state-level adoption delays caused commissioning slippages in FY25; may persist.
Current TBCB pipeline is only INR 45,000-46,000 crore, significantly lower than INR 92,000 crore won in FY25, which could slow order book growth.
ROE dipped ~100bps YoY as net worth grew faster than profits; further dilution possible if CapEx ramp-up requires equity.
Weak power demand and delayed PPAs for RE projects could reduce urgency for new transmission lines, affecting long-term pipeline.