JSW Steel / Q2-FY25

Read the quarter in context.

A source-linked quarter view: reported numbers, management language, guidance, and the risks that should carry forward.

Research layer active

ConCallIQ research layer

Signal, with the source still visible.

Use the controls below to narrow the view, then follow the evidence into the next layer of context.

Watch2024-10-25Back to JSWSTEEL

Revenue

₹39,684 Cr

verified against source

Revenue YoY

reported change

EBITDA

₹5,437 Cr

latest reported figure

Source

screener in

record provenance

Actual signal trajectory

Where this quarter sits.

source records only
EBITDA (₹ Cr)PositiveWatchNegative
12 actual records
Actual quarterly EBITDA (₹ Cr) trajectoryReported values plotted by quarter. Hover or focus a point for its quarter, value, and source sentiment.Q1 FY24: 7,046 · Positive source sentiment · 2023-07-21Q1 FY24Q2 FY24: 7,886 · Positive source sentiment · 2023-10-20Q2 FY24Q3 FY24: 7,180 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-01-19Q3 FY24Q4 FY24: 6,124 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-04-26Q4 FY24Q1 FY25: 5,510 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-07-19Q1 FY25Q2 FY25: 5,437 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-10-25Q2 FY25Q3 FY25: 5,579 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-01-23Q3 FY25Q4 FY25: 6,378 · Positive source sentiment · 2025-05-02Q4 FY25Q1 FY26: 7,576 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-07-25Q1 FY26Q2 FY26: 7,849 · Positive source sentiment · 2025-10-23Q2 FY26Q3 FY26: 6,496 · Positive source sentiment · 2026-01-20Q3 FY26Q4 FY26: 9,713 · Positive source sentiment · 2026-04-28Q4 FY269,7135,437
Values are taken from the available verified source records; sentiment color is a separate source-read indicator.

Quarter read

What the record says.

JSW Steel reported Q2 FY25 consolidated revenue of INR 39,684 crore, down 8% QoQ, with EBITDA of INR 5,437 crore (margin 13.7%) and PAT of INR 404 crore. Despite a sharp INR 3,000/ton sequential drop in domestic NSR and weak export realizations, cost savings from lower coking coal ($27/ton) and iron ore costs helped cushion margins. Domestic sales hit a record high, but overall sales fell 3% YoY due to a 30% drop in exports amid Chinese steel dumping. Management retained FY25 volume guidance of 27 million tons sales and 28.4 million tons production, with H2 volumes expected to ramp up from new capacities at BPSL and JVML. Q3 outlook is cautiously optimistic: coking coal costs to fall another $20-25/ton, domestic prices have bottomed and increased in October, and government CapEx recovery should boost demand. However, elevated imports and China's export surge remain key risks. The company also revised FY25 CapEx down to INR 16,000-17,000 crore due to project deferrals.

Colored figures show movement against the previous available record.

Guidance to track

  • Management reaffirmed full-year sales and production targets despite H1 headwinds, expecting H2 ramp-up from new capacities.
  • Coking coal costs expected to decline further in Q3, aiding margin expansion.
  • Reduction due to slurry pipeline transfer to JSW Infrastructure and BF3 shutdown deferral to FY26.
  • CFO committed to reducing leverage, with absolute debt expected to taper in H2 from working capital release.

Risks flagged

  • India's Q2 imports jumped 43% YoY to 3.18M tons, driven by Chinese exports, pressuring domestic prices and market share.
  • NMDC increased iron ore prices twice recently, which management deemed unwarranted, potentially squeezing spreads despite coking coal savings.
  • Ohio and Texas combined posted an EBITDA loss of $11 million due to price drops and unplanned maintenance shutdown, with uncertain recovery timing.
  • Net debt rose ~INR 4,900 crore to ~INR 85,000 crore due to CapEx, acquisition, and working capital build; CFO expects release of INR 1,500-2,000 crore in H2.

Key quotes

  • Our captive use in this quarter has gone up slightly, even on an increased volume of production. Our captive use was 41% versus 38%, last quarter.
  • We are retaining our volume guidance of 28.4 million tons for production and 27 million tons of sales for FY 2025.
  • The prices from the beginning of this April to September closing has fallen quite sharply. So today, the price levels at which most of the steel companies have been operating is not really sustainable.

Research modules

Go one layer deeper.