HCLTech / Q1-FY25

Read the quarter in context.

A source-linked quarter view: reported numbers, management language, guidance, and the risks that should carry forward.

Research layer active

ConCallIQ research layer

Signal, with the source still visible.

Use the controls below to narrow the view, then follow the evidence into the next layer of context.

Watch2024-07-12Back to HCLTECH

Revenue

₹28,057 Cr

verified against source

Revenue YoY

5.6%

reported change

EBITDA

Pending

latest reported figure

Source

screener in

record provenance

Actual signal trajectory

Where this quarter sits.

source records only
Revenue (₹ Cr)PositiveWatchNegative
12 actual records
Actual quarterly Revenue (₹ Cr) trajectoryReported values plotted by quarter. Hover or focus a point for its quarter, value, and source sentiment.Q1 FY24: 26,296 · Negative source sentiment · 2023-07-12Q1 FY24Q2 FY24: 26,672 · Positive source sentiment · 2023-10-12Q2 FY24Q3 FY24: 28,446 · Positive source sentiment · 2024-01-12Q3 FY24Q4 FY24: 28,499 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-04-12Q4 FY24Q1 FY25: 28,057 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-07-12Q1 FY25Q2 FY25: 28,862 · Positive source sentiment · 2024-10-14Q2 FY25Q3 FY25: 29,890 · Positive source sentiment · 2025-01-13Q3 FY25Q4 FY25: 30,246 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-04-15Q4 FY25Q1 FY26: 30,349 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-07-10Q1 FY26Q2 FY26: 31,942 · Positive source sentiment · 2025-10-14Q2 FY26Q3 FY26: 33,872 · Positive source sentiment · 2026-01-15Q3 FY26Q4 FY26: 33,981 · Negative source sentiment · 2026-04-22Q4 FY2633,98126,296
Values are taken from the available verified source records; sentiment color is a separate source-read indicator.

Quarter read

What the record says.

HCLTech reported Q1 FY25 revenue of $3.36B, down 1.6% sequentially but up 5.6% YoY in constant currency, slightly above expectations. Services revenue declined 1.9% QoQ, while Software grew 0.4% QoQ with ARR at $1.01B. EBIT margin was 17.1%, down 50bps QoQ but up 13bps YoY, within the guided 18-19% range for the full year. Growth was led by Telecom & Media (+69.2% YoY) and Retail (+9.7% YoY), while Manufacturing declined due to automotive weakness and ASAP acquisition softness. Bookings TCV was $1.96B. Management maintained FY25 revenue guidance of 3-5% and EBIT margin of 18-19%, expecting Q2 growth across all verticals except Financial Services due to State Street JV exit. GenAI momentum continues with AI Force and AI Foundry platforms, but discretionary spending remains cautious. Risk: Automotive sector stress in Europe could further impact Manufacturing revenue.

Colored figures show movement against the previous available record.

Guidance to track

  • Management reiterated full-year revenue growth guidance of 3-5% in constant currency, despite an 80bps impact from the State Street JV divestiture.
  • EBIT margin guidance for FY25 remains at 18-19%, with Q1 at 17.1% and expected improvement in subsequent quarters.
  • Management expects Q2 to show sequential growth in all verticals and geographies except Financial Services, which will be impacted by the State Street JV exit.
  • HCLTech targets training 50,000 employees on GenAI and AI skills this fiscal year; 33% of this target was achieved in Q1 alone.

Risks flagged

  • Softness in the automotive segment, especially in Europe, led to a sharp decline in ASAP acquisition revenue and impacted Manufacturing vertical performance.
  • Management noted that discretionary spend has not picked up meaningfully, and recovery depends on macro factors like interest rates and inflation.
  • CVK highlighted that competitive intensity, more than client expectations, is leading to irrational behavior in pricing for GenAI-related contracts.
  • The State Street BPO JV divestiture will cause an 80bps revenue impact at the company level and 90bps at the services level in Q2.

Key quotes

  • More than the expectations from the clients on GenAI, I think it's the competitive intensity which is kind of driving some irrational behavior.
  • Our guidance continues to be 18%-19%.
  • I think it's just the macro factors, I would assume. I mean, while some companies have delivered very good profitability and things like that, but there is still a conservatism that is there, which I think will loosen up a little bit with some signals and some real changes in the macros.

Research modules

Go one layer deeper.