Pressure on NIM from rising deposit costs
Management acknowledged stress on margins due to higher interest expenses on deposits, which could persist if liquidity remains tight.
Canara Bank · risk themes across the available quarters.
Bear-case history
Management acknowledged stress on margins due to higher interest expenses on deposits, which could persist if liquidity remains tight.
Analyst raised concern that PSLC income, which contributed significantly in Q1, will taper off in later quarters, impacting profitability.
Slippages in Q1 were concentrated in MSME (₹1,380 crore) and agriculture (₹800 crore), with SMA book elevated due to seasonal factors.
Incremental deposit costs are above 7.5%, pressuring NIMs. Management expects this to persist for 1-2 quarters unless liquidity improves.
A central PSU account of INR 3,800 crore slipped to SMA-0, though fully provided for. Further downgrade could impact asset quality.
CASA ratio fell to 32.7% from 35.4% in March, partly due to central government funds moving to RBI. Management explained but did not quantify recovery timeline.
CFO noted that Ind AS could require higher provisions on standard assets, potentially offsetting any relief on NPA provisions.
Management noted that additional rate cuts (2 more expected by market) could delay NIM recovery and make the 2.75-2.80% guidance difficult.
Two large accounts (real estate and irrigation) in SMA-2 for six quarters; management provided INR 1,200 crore extra provisions but risk remains if they slip.
CASA dropped to 29% due to institutional deposit outflows; management expects recovery but structural improvement remains a challenge.
PSLC volumes declined 30-40% YoY; higher yields compensated but sustainability of INR 1,200 crore quarterly run-rate is uncertain.
Elevated term deposit rates (7.25% special scheme) may pressure NIM, potentially falling to 2.9% if liquidity remains tight.
A single large LRD account (mall) under SMA-2 has been provisioned INR 650 crore; if it slips to NPA, recovery may be slow despite collateral.
Recovery from NCLT-referred accounts remains slow, with most resolutions via liquidation, limiting recoveries.
Bipartite settlement arrears from Nov 2022 could create a one-time expense shock; bank has provisioned INR 1,150 crore so far.
A central government steel exposure (RINL) contributed to SMA-2 spike; resolution is ongoing but could slip into NPA if not resolved.
CASA ratio at 31% keeps cost of deposits higher than peers; NIM may struggle to cross 3% in near term.
Another large SMA-2 account (~₹3,000 crore) with state government guarantee; though currently moved to SMA-1, it remains a risk.
Co-lending book is only ₹320 crore; management is cautious on underwriting standards, limiting growth in this segment.
If RBI cuts rates further, NIMs could face additional pressure as 45% of loans are repo-linked while deposit repricing lags by 9-12 months.
New expected credit loss norms from March 2027 may require higher provisions, especially for smaller accounts below ₹5 crore.
With balance sheet growing at 14%, maintaining CASA at 32% is challenging; management acknowledged the difficulty.
The bank made a precautionary provision of INR 380 crore on a Telangana drinking water project in SMA, indicating potential stress in state-level exposures.
Management acknowledged that cost of deposits is rising and NIM may face pressure, though they aim to keep it near 3%.
CASA growth (5.05% YoY) lags deposit growth (8.55%), impacting funding costs. Management has launched campaigns but no near-term target given.
Fresh slippages of INR 2,697 crore were largely from MSME (INR 1,200 crore) and agriculture (INR 1,000 crore), which could persist.
RBI's higher risk weights on NBFC and personal loans reduced capital by 52 bps; CET1 ratio fell to 15.78% from 16.20%.
Market liquidity constraints have made deposit mobilization costly, pressuring NIM. Management acknowledged the challenge and is using excess SLR and higher-rate deposits to manage.
Proposed RBI LCR guidelines effective April 2025 could reduce LCR by 11-12 bps, requiring costly longer-tenure deposits that may further compress NIM.
CASA ratio has fallen to 30% due to customers shifting surplus to term deposits or mutual funds. Management's initiatives may take time to reverse the trend.
RBI's potential changes to gold loan norms (collateral-free for PSL) may affect the bank's large gold loan portfolio, though management sees no immediate issue.
CASA ratio at ~30% is lower than peers, pressuring NIM. Management acknowledged this as an industry challenge and a key drag on margins.
With 49% of advances linked to repo rate, any further rate cuts could compress NIM further, though management expects stabilization at 2.45-2.50%.
Although management downplays impact, ECL provisions of INR 10,000 crore could reduce CET1 by ~1 percentage point if not amortized, though amortization mitigates this.
Q3 profit included INR 2,006 crore from stake sales in subsidiaries. Such gains are non-recurring, and treasury income may normalize if yields do not soften.
New RBI guidelines on project implementation could increase provisioning requirements, though management is confident of managing the impact.
Staff costs rose sharply due to bipartite settlement arrears and actuarial provisions; normalization expected from Q1 FY25.
The bank is gradually reducing INR 60,000-70,000 crore of low-yielding corporate loans, which may temper headline credit growth.
New accounting norms for investment portfolio could affect treasury profits, though initial impact added INR 1,400 crore to reserves.
Repo rate cuts could compress NIM as EBLR-linked loans reprice faster than deposits.
MSME slippages increased to INR 1,250 crore in Q4, partly due to technical factors, but underlying stress remains a concern.
Significant profit contribution from SR reversals and recoveries may not be sustainable.
CASA ratio declined to 31.17% from 32%+ in FY24 due to high interest rate regime and digital shift.
Recent media reports of gold loan fraud; management has checks but one-off incidents may occur.
Out of total slippage of INR 2,771 crore, INR 1,333 crore came from MSME, indicating stress in that segment.
Exact run-rate impact of ECL on credit cost not yet quantified; system implementation only by September.
Current account growth was sharply negative due to loss of four large accounts, impacting low-cost deposit base.