Retail slippage increase
Retail slippages rose substantially in Q1, partly due to seasonal factors and subsidy-dependent assets, but could persist.
Bank of Baroda · risk themes across the available quarters.
Bear-case history
Retail slippages rose substantially in Q1, partly due to seasonal factors and subsidy-dependent assets, but could persist.
MSME slippages remain elevated at ~4% run rate, though management says it has stabilized; any deterioration could impact credit cost.
Credit yield fell 25bps sequentially due to shedding of high-yield assets and competitive pricing, potentially pressuring NIM.
With 50bps repo rate cut in June, full impact on EBLR-linked loans will be felt in Q2, potentially pressuring NIM further.
A large international account slipped to NPA; resolution under CNC process may take 210 days, with 40% provision already made.
Analyst raised concern about rising slippages in personal loan and MSME; management acknowledged marginal increase but downplayed risk.
Analyst noted that ROA of 1.03% included substantial treasury gains; without them, maintaining 1% ROA may be challenging.
Deposit growth is under pressure due to savers shifting to capital markets, leading to a downward revision in deposit guidance.
Personal loan slippages have increased to ~INR 250 crore per quarter from ~INR 100 crore earlier, though still small relative to total book.
International NIM declined to ~2% from 2.13-2.14% due to repricing in overseas markets, with further moderation expected.
Higher prudential provisions (floating and standard asset) were taken this quarter, which could pressure earnings if sustained.
Treasury profit declined ~50% YoY due to bond yield movements, and further rate cuts could impact operating profit.
Implementation of ECL framework could increase credit cost by 20-25 bps on a steady-state basis, though management sees manageable impact.
With only 3% YoY corporate loan growth in H1, achieving 10-11% full-year guidance requires strong H2 pickup, which may be challenged by muted demand.
Further MCLR cuts could compress NIM if deposit costs do not moderate proportionately, though management expects range-bound NIM.
CD ratio at 84.24% and tight liquidity conditions could pressure margins if deposit costs remain high.
Personal loan GNPA rose to 3.9% from 3.16% QoQ, though management downplayed it as small in absolute terms.
RBI discussions on collateral-free agri loans and stricter gold loan norms could impact business, but management declined to comment.
Q2 had a one-off recovery of ~₹350 crore boosting interest income; its absence in Q3 contributed to margin decline.
Repricing of corporate loans at lower rates and elevated wholesale funding costs could pressure NIMs, especially if deposit costs do not decline further.
LCR dropped to 116% from 120% due to sale of investments; while management expects to rebuild, any delay could impact liquidity comfort.
Transition to ECL norms could impact CRAR by ~60bps over five years and increase recurring credit cost by ~18bps, though management considers it manageable.
Strong loan growth (15%) outpacing deposit growth (10%) may increase reliance on bulk deposits, potentially raising funding costs.
Deposit costs are slow to reprice downward, pressuring NIM in Q1 FY26 before expected recovery in H2.
MSME slippages increased by INR 300-500 crore in Q4, though management attributes it to legacy accounts and remains confident in overall asset quality.
International NIM fell to 1.97% from over 2% due to repricing of assets in a lower rate environment, impacting global NIM given the large international book.
The bank continues to amortize pension liabilities (INR 290 crore remaining), unlike peers who have fully written off, creating a future earnings drag.
Management expects cost of deposits to remain elevated in Q1 FY27 due to tight liquidity, limiting NIM improvement.
Exposure of INR 50,000-60,000 crore in Middle East retail operations may face stress due to geopolitical tensions; management is watchful.
Management declined to quantify the impact of final ECL guidelines, though earlier draft suggested ~18bps credit cost increase.
Interest on IT refund, which contributes to NIM, is volatile and may not sustain at current levels, though management accounts for it in guidance.