Bandhan Bank / Q2-FY26

Read the quarter in context.

A source-linked quarter view: reported numbers, management language, guidance, and the risks that should carry forward.

Research layer active

ConCallIQ research layer

Signal, with the source still visible.

Use the controls below to narrow the view, then follow the evidence into the next layer of context.

Negative2025-10-23Back to BANDHANBNK

Revenue

Pending

verification pending

Revenue YoY

reported change

EBITDA

Pending

latest reported figure

Source

manual review required

record provenance

Actual signal trajectory

Where this quarter sits.

source records only
PAT (₹ Cr)PositiveWatchNegative
12 actual records
Actual quarterly PAT (₹ Cr) trajectoryReported values plotted by quarter. Hover or focus a point for its quarter, value, and source sentiment.Q1 FY24: 721 · Watch source sentiment · 2023-07-20Q1 FY24Q2 FY24: 721 · Watch source sentiment · 2023-10-20Q2 FY24Q3 FY24: 733 · Positive source sentiment · 2024-01-31Q3 FY24Q4 FY24: 55 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-04-26Q4 FY24Q1 FY25: 1,063 · Positive source sentiment · 2024-07-26Q1 FY25Q2 FY25: 937 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-10-22Q2 FY25Q3 FY25: 426 · Negative source sentiment · 2025-01-17Q3 FY25Q4 FY25: 318 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-04-30Q4 FY25Q1 FY26: 372 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-07-15Q1 FY26Q2 FY26: 112 · Negative source sentiment · 2025-10-23Q2 FY26Q3 FY26: 206 · Watch source sentiment · 2026-01-20Q3 FY26Q4 FY26: 534 · Positive source sentiment · 2026-04-30Q4 FY261,06355
Values are taken from the available verified source records; sentiment color is a separate source-read indicator.

Quarter read

What the record says.

Bandhan Bank's Q2 FY26 results were below internal expectations, with PAT plunging 88% YoY to INR 112 crore due to margin compression and elevated credit costs. NIM fell to 5.8% (vs 6.4% QoQ) as the bank proactively passed on 75bps repo cut and recalculated MCLR, impacting yields. EEB stress persisted with gross slippages of INR 1,118 crore, though SMA 1/2 declined sequentially. Non-EEB advances grew 24% YoY, driving secured mix to 55%. Management expects NIM to trough in Q2 and improve from Q4 as deposit repricing benefits flow through. Credit cost guidance of 2.5-3% for EEB by FY27 exit remains. Key risk: political debt waiver rhetoric in Bihar could disrupt collections, though management sees no material impact yet.

Colored figures show movement against the previous available record.

Guidance to track

  • Management expects EEB credit cost to settle at 2.5-3% by FY27 exit, with overall bank credit cost at 1.5-1.6%.
  • NIM is expected to bottom at 5.8% in Q2 and improve from Q4 as term deposit repricing benefits flow through.
  • EEB portfolio is expected to see gradual growth from Q3 onwards as operating environment shows signs of recovery.
  • Secured loan mix is expected to increase further by 2-3 percentage points over the next 6-7 quarters.

Risks flagged

  • Opposition manifestos in Bihar elections propose debt waivers for SHGs, which could disrupt collections if implemented.
  • EEB slippages remained high at INR 1,118 crore, and management expects stress to continue for 1-2 more months.
  • The 200bps MCLR cut and repo rate pass-through compressed NIM more than expected, with full benefit delayed to Q4.
  • Net new EEB customer addition has stagnated due to industry-wide ineligibility, limiting growth potential.

Key quotes

  • This quarter's performance reflects a transitional phase for the bank as we continue to realign our portfolio and operating model in response to the changing environment.
  • We have taken steps to transition from a microfinance-focused bank to a full-service commercial bank.
  • We expect the margin should improve from these levels. This could be sort of the bottom point, at least during the financial year.

Research modules

Go one layer deeper.