Elevated slippages in microfinance book
Q1 slippages of INR 920 crore from the EEB book were higher than expected, though management cites seasonality.
Bandhan Bank · risk themes across the available quarters.
Bear-case history
Q1 slippages of INR 920 crore from the EEB book were higher than expected, though management cites seasonality.
Migration to a new core banking system in Q2 may cause operational disruption for 2-3 weeks, impacting growth.
Recovery of ECLGS claims may be delayed due to capacity constraints in the government portal, though expected in 3-6 months.
Cost of deposits rose 60bps QoQ due to mix shift and TD repricing; further repricing of ~60bps may pressure NIM.
The increase in risk weights on EEB portfolio to 125% reduced CRAR by 362 bps to 15%, potentially limiting growth if capital is not managed.
Management noted stress in SMA books from Punjab and Maharashtra, which could lead to higher slippages.
The bank is operating with an interim MD&CEO; the board has not yet submitted names to RBI, creating leadership uncertainty.
CASA ratio fell to 33.4% from 36% QoQ, and competitive deposit market may keep cost of funds elevated, pressuring NIMs.
Procedural change in raising demand on holidays increased SMA-0 pool; management says recoverable but may persist in Q2 due to festivals.
Growing secured loan share (lower yield) and repo rate cuts pressure NIM; management expects stabilization only in H2.
Analyst raised concern about aggressive lending by some players; management acknowledged risk but believes industry discipline will hold.
Analyst noted 4%+ NPA in recent vintages; management attributed to industry stress and expects improvement as new guardrails stabilize.
Despite DPD reduction, gross slippages remained high at INR 1,320 crore, with EEB contributing INR 1,000 crore. Management expects H2 improvement but past trends show elevated slippages in H2 as well.
CGFMU recovery of ~INR 1,600 crore delayed due to audit queries; ECLGS recovery of INR 410 crore pending due to operational constraints. Management could not provide a timeline.
Cost of funds expected to rise 20-25 bps in coming quarters due to savings rate hike and term deposit repricing, which could pressure NIMs despite higher yields.
Housing finance book grew only ~4% YoY, lagging other segments. While disbursement run-rate has improved, sustained growth remains uncertain.
EEB slippages increased to INR 752 crore in Q2, and SMA-0/1/2 pools expanded. Management expects elevated slippages in Q3, with uncertainty on recovery timing.
Shift towards secured assets (lower yield) could pressure NIMs. Management acknowledged potential yield stress in coming quarters.
Despite Bandhan's unique customer share of 60%, industry-wide over-leveraging and credit freeze risks could impact asset quality. RBI actions on MFI lenders may add systemic risk.
Tier 1 ratio (including H1 profits) at ~14% is adequate for now, but rapid secured book growth and elevated credit costs could necessitate capital raise if stress persists.
Opposition manifestos in Bihar elections propose debt waivers for SHGs, which could disrupt collections if implemented.
EEB slippages remained high at INR 1,118 crore, and management expects stress to continue for 1-2 more months.
The 200bps MCLR cut and repo rate pass-through compressed NIM more than expected, with full benefit delayed to Q4.
Net new EEB customer addition has stagnated due to industry-wide ineligibility, limiting growth potential.
NCGTC is conducting a detailed forensic audit on CGFMU claims; adverse findings could impact recoveries and provisions.
As the bank increases secured asset share, yields may decline, potentially pressuring NIMs despite cost controls.
Management expects INR 300-500 crore quarterly slippage addition, but this may vary if collection efficiency weakens.
Despite SMA 0 improvement, SMA 1+2 buckets increased, and management expects Q4 slippages to remain substantial (though lower than Q3).
Analyst raised concern about potential Karnataka legislation; management downplayed risk given small exposure (INR 740 crore), but uncertainty remains.
As secured mix increases, NIM is expected to moderate further, potentially pressuring profitability if volume growth doesn't compensate.
Adjusted OpEx grew 23% YoY, higher than NII growth of 12%, driven by technology investments and branch expansion, which may weigh on near-term efficiency.
42% of the microfinance portfolio is in West Bengal, where SMA1 rose sharply due to holiday-related collection gaps; state elections could disrupt collections.
CASA declined 4% YoY to INR 42,730 crore due to savings rate cuts; recovery to 31% ratio may take longer than expected.
NPAs in the housing portfolio have been rising; management cited legacy underwriting issues and is implementing process changes, but impact may take time.
INR 120 crore gratuity provision booked this quarter; further provisions may be needed as state-level rules are notified, but quantum is uncertain.
The pending CGFMU audit may not yield the expected positive result, potentially impacting recoveries and capital.
Founder MD & CEO Chandra Shekhar Ghosh is retiring on July 9, 2024, and a successor has not yet been identified, creating leadership uncertainty.
Despite improvement, slippages remain elevated at ₹1,017 crore; analysts questioned whether the run rate is truly sustainable.
OpEx grew 32% YoY in Q4 (23% adjusted for one-offs), and management expects cost-income ratio to remain elevated in FY25 due to investments.
Credit costs remain high at 3.9% due to continued stress in microfinance; management expects H1 FY26 to be challenging.
As secured book grows, yields are expected to moderate; CFO guided NIMs could decline 50-60bps over 3 years.
West Bengal accounts for 23% of advances and 40% of deposits; localized disruptions (e.g., Murshidabad) could impact collections.
Analyst noted that loans disbursed in FY24 have NPA rates of 3.5-4%, raising concerns about underwriting quality.
Management flagged potential adverse effects from ongoing war on fuel prices, inflation, and rural demand, which could impact asset quality and credit costs.
Transition impact of ECL norms estimated at INR 1,250 crore (based on Dec'25 portfolio), with annual CRAR impact of 16-17bps over 5 years. Flow impact still being assessed.
Management noted rising deposit rates offered by competitors, which could pressure cost of funds and margin expansion if the bank needs to offer higher rates to retain deposits.