Bajaj Housing Finance / Q4-FY25

Read the quarter in context.

A source-linked quarter view: reported numbers, management language, guidance, and the risks that should carry forward.

Research layer active

ConCallIQ research layer

Signal, with the source still visible.

Use the controls below to narrow the view, then follow the evidence into the next layer of context.

Positive2025-04-22Back to BAJAJHFL

Revenue

Pending

verification pending

Revenue YoY

reported change

EBITDA

Pending

latest reported figure

Source

manual review required

record provenance

Actual signal trajectory

Where this quarter sits.

source records only
PAT (₹ Cr)PositiveWatchNegative
7 actual records
Actual quarterly PAT (₹ Cr) trajectoryReported values plotted by quarter. Hover or focus a point for its quarter, value, and source sentiment.Q2 FY25: 5,45,60,00,000 · Positive source sentiment · 2024-10-22Q2 FY25Q3 FY25: 548 · Positive source sentiment · 2025-01-27Q3 FY25Q4 FY25: 587 · Positive source sentiment · 2025-04-22Q4 FY25Q1 FY26: 583 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-07-22Q1 FY26Q2 FY26: 643 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-10-30Q2 FY26Q3 FY26: 665 · Watch source sentiment · 2026-01-31Q3 FY26Q4 FY26: 669 · Watch source sentiment · 2026-04-30Q4 FY265,45,60,00,000548
Values are taken from the available verified source records; sentiment color is a separate source-read indicator.

Quarter read

What the record says.

Bajaj Housing Finance reported a strong Q4 FY25 with PAT surging 54% YoY to INR 587 crore, driven by 26% AUM growth to INR 114,684 crore and improving operational efficiency (OpEx-to-NTI ratio improved from 27.1% to 21.7%). Asset quality remained pristine with GNPA at 0.29% and NNPA at 0.11%. The company is investing in its Near Prime & Affordable SBU and non-top-6 markets to drive future growth. Management expects a 34-35 bps decline in cost of funds in FY26 assuming 75 bps repo rate cuts, but NIM compression of 10-15 bps is likely, partly offset by a favorable asset mix shift (e.g., developer finance share increasing). Key risk: competitive intensity from banks, especially PSUs, could pressure yields more than anticipated.

Colored figures show movement against the previous available record.

Guidance to track

  • Assuming 75 bps cumulative repo rate cuts, management expects cost of funds to drop by 34-35 bps on a full-year basis in FY26.
  • With steady book mix, net interest margin could compress by 10-15 bps during FY26, partly offset by asset mix changes.
  • On a steady-state basis (excluding assignment effects), credit cost is expected to be 20-25 bps on assets under management.
  • Management stated there is no plan to raise new equity capital in FY26, with leverage at 5.1x and headroom up to 7.5x.

Risks flagged

  • PSU banks have become more aggressive post repo rate cuts, and private banks were aggressive in March, potentially pressuring yields and market share.
  • Management acknowledged 10-15 bps NIM compression in FY26 due to repo rate cuts, with yield pass-through (45-50 bps) exceeding cost pass-through (34-35 bps).
  • RBI's proposed removal of exit penalties on floating rate loans could increase balance transfers in the LAP segment, though management expects limited material impact.
  • With long-tenor home loans (behavioral maturity 6-8 years) funded by shorter-term liabilities (average 3-5 years), ALM risk requires active management.

Key quotes

  • We are only a credit risk company, which we have to take a credit risk because we are in a lending business. Apart from that, we don't want to take an interest rate risk.
  • Our estimate is to assuming that two cuts which has happened and one cut more happens, YoY I think we should see a drop 34-35 basis points roughly.
  • There is no change in the medium term guidance on the key financial indicators what we had guided from last quarter's investor presentation.

Research modules

Go one layer deeper.