Power Finance Corporation / Q2-FY25

PFC Q2 FY25 earnings call.

A source-linked concall view: reported numbers, management language, guidance, commitments and risks that should carry forward.

Research layer active

ConCallIQ research layer

Signal, with the source still visible.

Use the controls below to narrow the view, then follow the evidence into the next layer of context.

PositiveCall date pendingBack to PFC

Revenue

Pending

verified against source

Revenue YoY

reported change

EBITDA

Pending

latest reported figure

Source

screener in

record provenance

Actual signal trajectory

Where this quarter sits.

source records only
PAT (₹ Cr)PositiveWatchNegative
4 actual records
Actual quarterly PAT (₹ Cr) trajectoryReported values plotted by quarter. Hover or focus a point for its quarter, value, and source sentiment.Q1 FY25: 7,182 · Positive source sentiment · 2024-07-01Q1 FY25Q2 FY25: 7,215 · Positive source sentimentQ2 FY25Q3 FY25: 7,760 · Watch source sentimentQ3 FY25Q2 FY26: 7,834 · Watch source sentimentQ2 FY267,8347,182
Values are taken from the available verified source records; sentiment color is a separate source-read indicator.

Quarter read

What the record says.

PFC delivered its highest ever quarterly net profit of INR 4,370 crore in Q2 FY25, up 14% YoY, driven by robust 21% growth in net interest income. The standout metric remains asset quality improvement—gross NPA dropped to 2.71%, down 96bps from 3.67% in H1 FY24, with the Lanco Amarkantak resolution delivering ~INR 200 crore provision reversal. The company disbursed INR 46,663 crore in Q2 alone, recovering from Q1's transformation-related slowdown, with total H1 sanctions of INR 1.6 lakh crore providing strong pipeline visibility. Management guided for ~14% loan book growth for FY25, similar to prior year, citing conservative capital deployment amid new sector exposures. Key risks include potential RBI circular impact on ECL provisioning, rising competitive intensity from NaBFID, and timeline uncertainty on NCLT resolutions for KSK Mahanadi and Sinnar. The GIFT City subsidiary commencement and $1.265 billion foreign currency deal demonstrate strategic expansion beyond traditional domestic boundaries.

Colored figures show movement against the previous available record.

Guidance to track

  • Management stated expecting 'similar level of growth as last financial year' which was ~14% YoY, aligning with robust H1 sanctions of INR 1.6 lakh crore and improved disbursement trajectory.
  • Guided that margins will stay within the stated range, noting H1 NIM was 'slightly above 3.5%' at 3.57%, with trajectory dependent on growth and mix.
  • Shiga Energy (INR 522 crore) and TRN Energy (INR 1,139 crore) are in 'advanced state of resolution' with lender approvals received for Shiga; documentation and implementation expected by fiscal year-end.
  • While bid evaluation is underway with expected >100% recovery on principal, final resolution depends on NCLT approval timing which management cannot commit to.

Risks flagged

  • Management confirmed industry-wide representations have been made to RBI through respective ministries regarding the infrastructure provisioning circular. Final version's impact on capital requirements remains uncertain pending regulatory clarity.
  • Management acknowledged NaBFID and other new entrants in infrastructure financing space, noting 'all institutions have sufficient headroom available for growth'—implying market share pressure may intensify.
  • CAR declined from ~27% to 24.38% in one quarter. Analyst raised concern that conservative provisioning on stressed assets (KSK: INR 1,800 crore, TRN: INR 550 crore) while maintaining dividends may limit growth capital deployment flexibility.
  • Board decided not to proceed with Shapoorji Pallonji exposure citing 'new sector' risk despite completed due diligence. Management did not provide specifics on why the opportunity was rejected after extensive process, leaving uncertainty on sector appetite.

Key quotes

  • We have resolved around 55% of our stress asset pool. On resolution of these stress assets on an average we have achieved recovery of more than 60% which is among the highest in the infrastructure financing.
  • Maintaining the capital I think is going to be for a consistent growth going forward. We need some capital on the regular basis. But yes, to some extent during the intervening period we may have some reversals resulting in higher profits.
  • We have invited the bids and at one stage we have received the bids, but the evaluation process is still on. So I think in a month or so we may finalize the evaluation and then we will submit it to NCLT.

Research modules

Go one layer deeper.