Stage 2 Asset Creep from State Utilities
Stage 2 assets increased to ~11% of outstanding (vs 7.5% in Q4), driven by habitual delays from state electricity utilities in remitting dues. While none have defaulted, provisioning volatility remains.
Power Finance Corporation · risk themes across the available quarters.
Bear-case history
Stage 2 assets increased to ~11% of outstanding (vs 7.5% in Q4), driven by habitual delays from state electricity utilities in remitting dues. While none have defaulted, provisioning volatility remains.
BCG-led transformation temporarily slowed Q1 disbursements. Management expects another quarter for complete process stabilization; any delays could impact FY25 growth targets.
KSK Mahanadi resolution is court-driven; while management expects FY25 completion, external factors could delay recovery and associated write-backs.
Media reports speculated on sanctioned exposure for Shapoorji Pallonji infrastructure project. Management clarified sanction was conditional on further due diligence with no funds disbursed; deal outcome uncertain.
Management confirmed industry-wide representations have been made to RBI through respective ministries regarding the infrastructure provisioning circular. Final version's impact on capital requirements remains uncertain pending regulatory clarity.
Management acknowledged NaBFID and other new entrants in infrastructure financing space, noting 'all institutions have sufficient headroom available for growth'—implying market share pressure may intensify.
CAR declined from ~27% to 24.38% in one quarter. Analyst raised concern that conservative provisioning on stressed assets (KSK: INR 1,800 crore, TRN: INR 550 crore) while maintaining dividends may limit growth capital deployment flexibility.
Board decided not to proceed with Shapoorji Pallonji exposure citing 'new sector' risk despite completed due diligence. Management did not provide specifics on why the opportunity was rejected after extensive process, leaving uncertainty on sector appetite.
H1 saw INR 1,100 crore exchange loss on unhedged EUR portfolio (11% of loan book EUR-denominated; 5% unhedged). Management expects gradual reversal as EUR/USD normalizes, but timing is market-dependent and not guaranteed.
Draft circular effective April 2026 could reclassify infrastructure exposures from 50% to 75% risk weight for some assets, potentially compressing CRAR. Management has not quantified the impact.
Two generation projects accounted for ~INR 10,000 crore of prepayments in H1. Rising refinancing by borrowers to lower-cost lenders is a structural headwind to maintaining even 10-11% growth guidance.
GOM committee reviewing DISCOM viability; if bailout similar to UDAY materializes, large accelerated prepayments could disrupt loan growth trajectory. Management declined to quantify impact awaiting government report.
95% of $9 billion foreign currency portfolio is hedged, leaving ~$450 million unhedged. Each INR 1 depreciation impacts P&L by ~INR 45 crore; theoretical impact of INR 400-500 crore if rupee reaches 88.
Resolution plan submitted to NCLT on January 17, 2025; approval timeline remains uncertain despite management targeting resolution this financial year.
One promoter with three waste-to-energy projects totaling INR 130 crore slipped to Stage 3 in Q3 due to technical issues. Analyst questioned whether this indicates broader sector stress.
An investor (Romil Oza) criticized management for not disclosing recovery amounts from stressed assets, questioning transparency on liquidation values and provisioning on NPA accounts.