Kotak Mahindra Bank / Q3-FY26

Read the quarter in context.

A source-linked quarter view: reported numbers, management language, guidance, and the risks that should carry forward.

Research layer active

ConCallIQ research layer

Signal, with the source still visible.

Use the controls below to narrow the view, then follow the evidence into the next layer of context.

Positive2026-01-17Back to KOTAKBANK

Revenue

Pending

verified against source

Revenue YoY

reported change

EBITDA

Pending

latest reported figure

Source

screener in partial

record provenance

Actual signal trajectory

Where this quarter sits.

source records only
PAT (₹ Cr)PositiveWatchNegative
12 actual records
Actual quarterly PAT (₹ Cr) trajectoryReported values plotted by quarter. Hover or focus a point for its quarter, value, and source sentiment.Q1 FY24: 4,150 · Positive source sentiment · 2023-07-22Q1 FY24Q2 FY24: 4,461 · Watch source sentiment · 2023-10-20Q2 FY24Q3 FY24: 4,265 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-01-20Q3 FY24Q4 FY24: 5,337 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-04-27Q4 FY24Q1 FY25: 7,448 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-07-20Q1 FY25Q2 FY25: 5,044 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-10-19Q2 FY25Q3 FY25: 4,700 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-01-18Q3 FY25Q4 FY25: 4,933 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-04-15Q4 FY25Q1 FY26: 4,472 · Negative source sentiment · 2025-07-26Q1 FY26Q2 FY26: 4,468 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-10-25Q2 FY26Q3 FY26: 4,924 · Positive source sentiment · 2026-01-17Q3 FY26Q4 FY26: 5,423 · Watch source sentiment · 2026-04-25Q4 FY267,4484,150
Values are taken from the available verified source records; sentiment color is a separate source-read indicator.

Quarter read

What the record says.

Kotak Mahindra Bank reported a solid Q3 FY26 with standalone PAT of INR 3,400 crore, supported by healthy NIM of 4.54% and improving credit costs at 63 bps (down from 79 bps QoQ). Net advances grew 16% YoY and average deposits 15% YoY, driven by granular CASA growth and strong traction in SME (17% YoY) and mortgage (18% YoY) books. Management highlighted continued normalization of credit costs, though retail CV remains under watch. Fee income grew 6% QoQ, aided by capital markets and distribution. Guidance points to moderate NIM improvement in Q4, with deposit repricing tailwinds largely behind. Risk: potential hardening of term deposit rates and lingering stress in retail CV could pressure margins and asset quality.

Colored figures show movement against the previous available record.

Guidance to track

  • Management expects NIM to increase moderately in Q4 due to full-quarter benefit of CRR cuts and seasonal aberrations, assuming no further rate cuts.
  • Credit cost expected to continue its downward trend in Q4 and Q1, though at a moderated pace, with retail CV stress plateauing.
  • Management aims to maintain cost-to-asset ratio in the range of 2.5%-2.6% over the medium term, driven by fixed cost control and digitization.
  • Personal loan book expected to return to growth in coming quarters as organic disbursements pick up, while credit card spend growth to follow.

Risks flagged

  • Management continues to cautiously monitor the retail commercial vehicle segment, which has shown elevated stress; tighter underwriting and reduced disbursements are in place.
  • CFO noted that term deposit rates have inched up in early January, and liquidity tightening could pressure cost of funds in Q4.
  • Draft ECL circular could require additional provisions; management estimates impact at less than 2% of net worth, but final circular may differ.
  • Core fee income growth has been weaker than loan growth; management attributes it to muted credit card fees and expects gradual improvement.

Key quotes

  • Our strategy is clear, execution is progressing well, and we are seeing good traction in customer acquisitions, deposit, and asset levels.
  • The unsecured credit cost is behind us now, and that's what is effectively resulting in the reduction what we saw during the quarter.
  • We look at every single transaction that comes up in the marketplace... we essentially have three criteria: strategic fit, valuation, and integration bandwidth.

Research modules

Go one layer deeper.