Kotak Mahindra Bank / Q1-FY26

Read the quarter in context.

A source-linked quarter view: reported numbers, management language, guidance, and the risks that should carry forward.

Research layer active

ConCallIQ research layer

Signal, with the source still visible.

Use the controls below to narrow the view, then follow the evidence into the next layer of context.

Negative2025-07-26Back to KOTAKBANK

Revenue

Pending

verified against source

Revenue YoY

reported change

EBITDA

Pending

latest reported figure

Source

screener in partial

record provenance

Actual signal trajectory

Where this quarter sits.

source records only
PAT (₹ Cr)PositiveWatchNegative
12 actual records
Actual quarterly PAT (₹ Cr) trajectoryReported values plotted by quarter. Hover or focus a point for its quarter, value, and source sentiment.Q1 FY24: 4,150 · Positive source sentiment · 2023-07-22Q1 FY24Q2 FY24: 4,461 · Watch source sentiment · 2023-10-20Q2 FY24Q3 FY24: 4,265 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-01-20Q3 FY24Q4 FY24: 5,337 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-04-27Q4 FY24Q1 FY25: 7,448 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-07-20Q1 FY25Q2 FY25: 5,044 · Watch source sentiment · 2024-10-19Q2 FY25Q3 FY25: 4,700 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-01-18Q3 FY25Q4 FY25: 4,933 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-04-15Q4 FY25Q1 FY26: 4,472 · Negative source sentiment · 2025-07-26Q1 FY26Q2 FY26: 4,468 · Watch source sentiment · 2025-10-25Q2 FY26Q3 FY26: 4,924 · Positive source sentiment · 2026-01-17Q3 FY26Q4 FY26: 5,423 · Watch source sentiment · 2026-04-25Q4 FY267,4484,150
Values are taken from the available verified source records; sentiment color is a separate source-read indicator.

Quarter read

What the record says.

Kotak Mahindra Bank reported a 7% YoY decline in standalone PAT to INR 3,282 crore, driven by margin compression and elevated credit costs. NIM fell to 4.65% from 5.02% a year ago due to repo rate cuts and a shift in asset mix. Credit costs rose to 90 bps, led by stress in microfinance (peaked in Q1), retail CV, and seasonal rural factors. Management expects NIM to stabilize in H2 as deposit repricing and CRR cuts offset asset yield drag. MFI credit costs are expected to decline, while cards and personal loans have stabilized. Risks include continued stress in retail CV and slower-than-expected economic recovery. The bank maintains a cautious stance on unsecured lending, targeting a 15% share over time.

Colored figures show movement against the previous available record.

Guidance to track

  • Management expects NIM to stabilize in the second half of the year as deposit repricing and CRR cuts offset asset yield drag, assuming no further repo rate cuts.
  • Microfinance credit costs have peaked in Q1 and are expected to show a declining trend in coming quarters as fresh disbursements resume cautiously.
  • Credit card credit costs have plateaued and should start declining in the second half of the year.
  • Aspirationally, the bank aims to grow retail unsecured advances to 15% of total advances, from current 9.7%, through MFI, personal loans, and credit cards.

Risks flagged

  • Stress in the retail commercial vehicle segment, particularly goods transportation, is expected to continue for another quarter or two, with management moderating disbursements.
  • An analyst questioned whether the bank's runoff mode in microfinance could reduce borrowers' willingness to pay, potentially leading to higher loss rates. Management acknowledged the risk but expressed confidence in new underwriting models.
  • An analyst flagged that economic growth is a key variable for MSME debt servicing. Management said they are monitoring closely but noted the portfolio is secured and holistic customer view helps.
  • The full impact of the June repo rate cut will be felt in Q2, and NIM may bottom out only then before recovering in H2. This was highlighted in Q&A.

Key quotes

  • We believe it has peaked in this quarter and we expect it to be stable and hopefully better in the second half of the year.
  • Unless there are further rate cuts, we expect the NIM to stabilize over the year.
  • The MFI stress started building and reflecting in the books from the Q3 of last year... clearly, the gross NPA, which sort of flowed during Q3, Q4, given the provisioning norms of 75%, 25%, I think all accumulated towards the Q1 hit.

Research modules

Go one layer deeper.