Bank of Baroda
bullish highBank of Baroda reported a strong Q4 FY26 with net profit of ₹5,616 crore (up 11.2% YoY), the highest ever quarterly profit.
Read Bank of Baroda analysis →Side-by-side earnings comparison across financial stats, AI summaries, management guidance, risks, quotes, and accountability signals.
Bank of Baroda reported a strong Q4 FY26 with net profit of ₹5,616 crore (up 11.2% YoY), the highest ever quarterly profit.
Read Bank of Baroda analysis →Union Bank of India reported a strong Q4 FY26 with net profit of ₹18,697 crore and recommended a dividend of ₹5 per share.
Read Union Bank of analysis →Bank of Baroda and Union Bank of were broadly matched on the combined revenue-growth and EBITDA-margin read. Revenue growth is compared first, with EBITDA margin used as the quality check.
Bank of Baroda reported a strong Q4 FY26 with net profit of ₹5,616 crore (up 11.2% YoY), the highest ever quarterly profit. Global business crossed ₹30.78 lakh crore, with advances growing 16.2% YoY driven by retail (17.9%), agriculture (20.7%), and MSME (15.6%). NIM improved to 2.89% (up 10 bps QoQ) aided by IT refunds, though management guided a conservative 2.75-2.95% for FY27 due to sticky deposit costs. Asset quality remained robust with GNPA at 1.89% and NNPA at 0.45%. The bank raised a ₹10,000 crore green infra bond and plans ₹14,500 crore capital raise (equity + AT1/Tier 2) over the medium term. Key risk: geopolitical headwinds could pressure liquidity and asset quality in the overseas book.
Union Bank of India reported a strong Q4 FY26 with net profit of ₹18,697 crore and recommended a dividend of ₹5 per share. The bank achieved robust business growth, with gross advances up 9.74% YoY and a significant improvement in CASA ratio to 35.21% from 32.51% in September. Management highlighted a strategic shift from bulk deposits to retail term deposits and CASA, reducing bulk deposits by ₹70,000 crore. The bank also created a ₹700 crore contingency provision without impacting profit or capital. NIM compressed to 2.64% due to the December rate cut but management expects stabilization and gradual improvement. Credit cost was low at 23 bps for the year, with guidance of ~1% for FY27. Key risks include potential stress from West Asia disruptions and elevated SMA1 levels, though management sees no material impact yet. The bank targets 13-14% credit growth in FY27 while maintaining asset quality and profitability.
Crossed milestone of ₹30 lakh crore; driven by strong advances and deposit growth.
Improved sequentially; focus on low-cost deposits continues.
Reduced YoY; asset quality remains robust.
Well within guidance; excluding floating provision would be 0.34%.
CASA improved from 32.51% in September 2025 to 35.21% in March 2026, driven by focus on low-cost deposits.
Gross NPAs reduced significantly year-on-year, reflecting improved asset quality.
Net NPAs declined to 0.48%, indicating strong recovery and lower slippages.
Common Equity Tier 1 ratio improved from 14.98% to 15.69%, strengthening capital base.
Upsized from earlier 11-13% due to strong performance, subject to global headwinds.
Management guidance growthUpsized from 9-11% reflecting improved deposit mobilization.
Management guidance growthConservative range accounting for sticky deposit costs and volatile IT refunds.
Management guidance marginsManagement expects to achieve 13-14% credit growth in FY27, in line with industry trends and better than the 9.74% YoY growth in FY26.
Management guidance growthManagement expects NIM to defend current levels and gradually improve, driven by CASA expansion and better asset-liability management.
Management guidance marginsManagement guided credit cost around 1% for FY27, up from 23 bps in FY26, reflecting normalization and prudent provisioning.
Management guidance marginsCost of deposits likely to remain elevated due to tight liquidity, limiting margin expansion.
medium · management_commentaryMiddle East exposure (~₹50-60k cr) and trade disruptions could stress asset quality, though currently benign.
medium · analyst_questionFinal guidelines may increase credit cost; management declined to quantify impact until full computation.
medium · analyst_questionOngoing West Asia conflict could stress energy-sensitive sectors and remittance flows, though management sees no material impact yet.
medium · analyst_questionSMA1 loans nearly doubled sequentially, indicating potential stress in the near term, though management attributed it to migration from SMA2.
medium · data_observationFurther repo rate cuts could compress NIM, though management expects to defend margins through liability mix improvement.
low · management_commentaryWe have a very strong growth both on the balance sheet and also on the profit and loss.
The only scope for us to realign the asset pricing right... there is a scope for realigning that portfolio and that is what actually our strategy to look into those pricing very closely.
We are choosing growth with quality number one and with profitability.
We would like to defend our name we want to defend. We continued saying that and that is what we tried.