Bank of Baroda
bullish highBank of Baroda reported a strong Q4 FY26 with net profit of ₹5,616 crore (up 11.2% YoY), the highest ever quarterly profit.
Read Bank of Baroda analysis →Side-by-side earnings comparison across financial stats, AI summaries, management guidance, risks, quotes, and accountability signals.
Bank of Baroda reported a strong Q4 FY26 with net profit of ₹5,616 crore (up 11.2% YoY), the highest ever quarterly profit.
Read Bank of Baroda analysis →Bank of India reported a strong Q4 FY26 with net profit of ₹10,527 crore (up 14% YoY) driven by robust business growth and improved asset quality.
Read Bank of India analysis →Bank of Baroda and Bank of India were broadly matched on the combined revenue-growth and EBITDA-margin read. Revenue growth is compared first, with EBITDA margin used as the quality check.
Bank of Baroda reported a strong Q4 FY26 with net profit of ₹5,616 crore (up 11.2% YoY), the highest ever quarterly profit. Global business crossed ₹30.78 lakh crore, with advances growing 16.2% YoY driven by retail (17.9%), agriculture (20.7%), and MSME (15.6%). NIM improved to 2.89% (up 10 bps QoQ) aided by IT refunds, though management guided a conservative 2.75-2.95% for FY27 due to sticky deposit costs. Asset quality remained robust with GNPA at 1.89% and NNPA at 0.45%. The bank raised a ₹10,000 crore green infra bond and plans ₹14,500 crore capital raise (equity + AT1/Tier 2) over the medium term. Key risk: geopolitical headwinds could pressure liquidity and asset quality in the overseas book.
Bank of India reported a strong Q4 FY26 with net profit of ₹10,527 crore (up 14% YoY) driven by robust business growth and improved asset quality. Global business grew 14.6% to ₹16.98 lakh crore, with deposits up 13.6% and advances up 15.8%. Asset quality improved significantly: GNPA ratio fell 129 bps to 1.98% and NNPA to 0.56%. Management guided for 15-16% credit growth and 13-14% deposit growth in FY27, targeting domestic NIM of ~3% and ROA of 1%. Key risks include geopolitical headwinds impacting MSMEs and potential credit cost increase from ECL implementation (estimated 10 bps annual impact).
Crossed milestone of ₹30 lakh crore; driven by strong advances and deposit growth.
Improved sequentially; focus on low-cost deposits continues.
Reduced YoY; asset quality remains robust.
Well within guidance; excluding floating provision would be 0.34%.
Total global business (deposits + advances) grew to ₹16.98 lakh crore from ₹14.63 lakh crore.
CASA ratio declined from ~40% in FY25 to 37.64% due to structural shift in deposits.
GNPA ratio improved to 1.98% from 3.27% in FY25, reflecting better asset quality.
Credit cost improved to 0.46% in FY26 from 0.76% in FY25.
Upsized from earlier 11-13% due to strong performance, subject to global headwinds.
Management guidance growthUpsized from 9-11% reflecting improved deposit mobilization.
Management guidance growthConservative range accounting for sticky deposit costs and volatile IT refunds.
Management guidance marginsGlobal advances expected to grow 15-16% in FY27, driven by RAM and mid-corporate segments.
Management guidance growthGlobal deposits targeted to grow 13-14% in FY27, with focus on CASA and retail term deposits.
Management guidance growthManagement aims to improve domestic NIM from 2.78% to near 3% by end of FY27 through better yield and lower cost of deposits.
Management guidance marginsCost of deposits likely to remain elevated due to tight liquidity, limiting margin expansion.
medium · management_commentaryMiddle East exposure (~₹50-60k cr) and trade disruptions could stress asset quality, though currently benign.
medium · analyst_questionFinal guidelines may increase credit cost; management declined to quantify impact until full computation.
medium · analyst_questionRising crude prices, supply chain disruptions, and interest rate hikes may stress MSME and export-oriented sectors.
medium · analyst_questionTransition to ECL guidelines from April 2027 may increase credit cost by ~10 bps annually, though management expects smooth transition.
low · management_commentaryCASA ratio fell to 37.64% from ~40% due to structural shift, potentially increasing cost of deposits if not reversed.
medium · data_observationWe have a very strong growth both on the balance sheet and also on the profit and loss.
The only scope for us to realign the asset pricing right... there is a scope for realigning that portfolio and that is what actually our strategy to look into those pricing very closely.
We have already done lot of homework and preparation since the draft guidelines have come. We have onboarded one of the big fours for the transitioning towards the ECL regime.
We want to increase our MCLR advances. Second part is that we want to increase more of our RAM advances because there the margins are much better.