ACC
bearish highAmbuja Cement reported a disappointing Q4 FY26 with cost per tonne hitting ₹4,500, well above the earlier target of ₹4,000.
Read ACC analysis →Side-by-side earnings comparison across financial stats, AI summaries, management guidance, risks, quotes, and accountability signals.
Ambuja Cement reported a disappointing Q4 FY26 with cost per tonne hitting ₹4,500, well above the earlier target of ₹4,000.
Read ACC analysis →Ambuja Cements reported a disappointing Q4 FY26 with cost per ton surging to ₹4,500, well above the earlier target of ₹4,100, driven by higher freight, packing costs from the West Asia crisis, and elevated repairs at acquired assets (Sanghi, Penna).
Read Ambuja Cements analysis →ACC had the stronger quarter on this simple score because its revenue growth plus EBITDA margin beat Ambuja Cements. Revenue growth is compared first, with EBITDA margin used as the quality check.
Ambuja Cement reported a disappointing Q4 FY26 with cost per tonne hitting ₹4,500, well above the earlier target of ₹4,000. Full-year EBITDA per tonne was ₹887, up 12% YoY, but Q4 saw significant cost inflation from packaging, fuel, and higher repairs at acquired assets (Sanghi at 57% utilization, Penna at 46%). Management admitted a 3-6 month delay in efficiency capex and guided for only ₹250/tonne cost reduction in FY27, implying average cost of ~₹4,250. Volume guidance of 80 million tonnes (8% growth) relies on stabilizing acquired assets and commissioning 10mt new capacity, but industry demand is expected to grow only 5-5.5%. Capex is being recalibrated to ₹6,000-6,500 crore for FY27, with a reset in ambition and timeline for the 140mt capacity target. Key risk: inability to pass on cost increases due to soft demand, further pressuring margins.
Ambuja Cements reported a disappointing Q4 FY26 with cost per ton surging to ₹4,500, well above the earlier target of ₹4,100, driven by higher freight, packing costs from the West Asia crisis, and elevated repairs at acquired assets (Sanghi, Penna). Annual sales volume hit a record 73.7 million tons (+16% YoY), but EBITDA per ton at ₹887 missed expectations. Management admitted to execution failures, resetting capacity expansion timelines and guiding for only 8% volume growth in FY27 to ~80 million tons, below industry growth of 5-5.5%. Cost reduction of ₹250/ton is targeted for FY27, but Q1 is expected to remain flat at elevated levels. The key risk is that pricing power remains weak, with only ₹10/bag improvement, and cost inflation may persist if global energy prices stay high.
Highest ever annual volume, driven by capacity additions and acquired assets.
Sustained progress on premiumization; Q4 share at 36%.
Increased from 68% in Q3, reflecting focus on branded sales.
Green power share increased to 32% in Q4 from 26% a year ago.
Highest ever annual volume, growing ahead of industry.
Normalized EBITDA/ton improved but missed internal targets.
Premium mix sustained at 36% in Q4, supporting realizations.
Green power share increased to 32% in Q4 from 26% last year.
Management expects 8% volume growth to ~80mt, driven by stabilization of acquired assets and new capacity commissioning.
Management guidance growthTargeting average cost reduction of ₹250/tonne in FY27 from Q4 FY26 exit cost of ₹4,500, implying ~₹4,250 average.
Management guidance marginsCapital expenditure guided at ₹6,000-6,500 crore, with focus on completing ongoing projects and debottlenecking.
Management guidance capexManagement expects 8% volume growth to ~80 million tons in FY27, driven by stabilization of acquired assets and new capacities.
Management guidance growthTargeting ₹250/ton reduction in average cost from Q4 FY26 exit of ₹4,500/ton, reaching ~₹4,250/ton for FY27.
Management guidance marginsCapital expenditure for FY27 estimated at ₹6,000-6,500 crore, focused on completing ongoing projects and debottlenecking.
Management guidance capexWest Asia war led to packaging cost spikes and fuel cost increases, adding ~₹250/tonne in Q4; further escalation could derail cost reduction targets.
high · management_commentaryManagement noted demand is soft and price increases of only ₹10-15/bag have been achieved, insufficient to offset cost inflation.
high · analyst_questionManagement admitted 3-6 month delays in efficiency projects, which could push cost savings beyond FY27.
medium · management_commentaryPacking bag costs and fuel prices surged in March due to geopolitical tensions, adding ~₹250/ton to costs. Further escalation could delay cost reduction targets.
high · management_commentaryDespite cost inflation, cement prices have only increased by ₹10-15/bag in select pockets. Management expects subdued demand in April-May, limiting ability to pass on costs.
high · analyst_questionProjects have been delayed due to contractor issues, incomplete engineering, and lack of team bandwidth. Management has reset timelines, but further slippages could impact volume growth.
medium · management_commentaryWe are not moving away from the target, yes we are moving away from the timeline.
4500 is the peak and this 250 reduction is from here.
We are not moving away from the target, yes we are moving away from the timeline.
4500 is the peak and this 250 reduction is from here.